Skoda Felicia 1996 vs Audi 80 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Audi 80 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Felicia engine produces 26 HP less power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Audi 80. Due to the lower power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.5 | |
|
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Felicia consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1600 km on highway | ||
| Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Felicia engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A6, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Alhambra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Felicia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi 80 1992 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Audi 80 1992 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Felicia is 28 cm shorter than the Audi 80, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1200 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Skoda Felicia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 750 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Skoda Felicia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Felicia, so Skoda Felicia quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Audi 80 has
| |