Skoda Felicia 1996 vs Skoda Fabia 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Felicia and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, but Skoda Felicia torque is 1 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 4.8 | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Felicia consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is smaller. Skoda Felicia is 10 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1015 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 750 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 205 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |