Skoda Felicia 1996 vs Mazda 323 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mazda 323 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Felicia engine produces 52 HP less power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Mazda 323. Due to the lower power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 8.0 | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Felicia consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Skoda Felicia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is smaller, but higher. Skoda Felicia is 38 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 323. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 750 | 1`625 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |