Skoda Felicia 1996 vs Honda Civic 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Felicia engine produces 26 HP less power than Honda Civic, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.0 | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Felicia consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Skoda Felicia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Felicia engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Felicia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Skoda Felicia engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Felicia is 33 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 225 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.5 metres more than that of the Honda Civic, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 750 | 1`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Honda Civic has
| |