Skoda Felicia 1996 vs Seat Cordoba 1996
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Felicia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Felicia and Seat Cordoba have the same engine power, but Skoda Felicia torque is 10 NM more than Seat Cordoba. Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that by driving the Skoda Felicia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Felicia consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Skoda Felicia is 28 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.5 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Seat Cordoba has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |