Skoda Felicia 1997 vs Seat Cordoba 1996
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 15.7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Felicia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Felicia engine produces 8 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, but torque is 10 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Thanks to more power Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Felicia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Skoda Felicia is 28 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.5 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Seat Cordoba has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |