Skoda Felicia 1997 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Felicia engine produces 7 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Skoda Felicia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Felicia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is smaller, but higher. Skoda Felicia is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |