Skoda Felicia 1997 vs Mazda 121 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 54 HP | 60 HP | |
Torque: | 99 NM | 103 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 15.9 seconds | |
Skoda Felicia engine produces 6 HP less power than Mazda 121, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Mazda 121. Despite less power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.0 | |
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Felicia consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 121, which means that by driving the Skoda Felicia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
Skoda Felicia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.86 m | 3.83 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.32 m | |
Skoda Felicia is larger. Skoda Felicia is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 121, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 250 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 121, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`460 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | low | |
Mazda 121 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 121, so Mazda 121 quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Mazda 121 has
| |