Skoda Felicia 1997 vs Nissan Micra 1996

 
Skoda Felicia
1997 - 1998
Nissan Micra
1996 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 54 HP75 HP
Torque: 99 NM103 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.5 seconds12 seconds
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Felicia engine produces 21 HP less power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Nissan Micra. Due to the lower power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.1
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km6.7 l/100km
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Felicia consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway850 km on highway
570 km with real consumption620 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.86 m3.70 m
Width: 1.64 m1.58 m
Height: 1.42 m1.43 m
Skoda Felicia is larger, but slightly lower.
Skoda Felicia is 16 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data206 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data960 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters9.2 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 1.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 9001`300
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

below average
Nissan Micra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably better
Average price (€): 600600
Pros and Cons:
    Nissan Micra has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • better manoeuvrability
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv