Skoda Felicia 1995 vs Mazda 121 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 94 NM | 103 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 15.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 121 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Felicia engine produces 6 HP less power than Mazda 121, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Mazda 121. Due to the lower power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.0 | |
| Skoda Felicia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 121, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is larger. Skoda Felicia is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 121, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 121, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Mazda 121 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 121, so Mazda 121 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 121 has
| |