Skoda Felicia 1995 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 100 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 16.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Felicia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Felicia engine produces 13 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Felicia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Skoda Felicia is 14 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 975 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |