Skoda Felicia 1995 vs Mazda 121 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 103 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 15.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Felicia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Felicia engine produces 8 HP more power than Mazda 121, but torque is 3 NM less than Mazda 121. Thanks to more power Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.0 | |
| Skoda Felicia consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 121, which means that by driving the Skoda Felicia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is larger. Skoda Felicia is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 121, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 121, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mazda 121 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Felicia, so Mazda 121 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Mazda 121 has
| |