Skoda Felicia 1995 vs Seat Ibiza 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Skoda Felicia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Felicia engine produces 8 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, but torque is 16 NM less than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Felicia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Felicia is 5 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 580 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.7 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Ibiza has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Felicia, so Seat Ibiza quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |