Skoda Felicia 1995 vs Mazda 323 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Skoda Felicia engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Mazda 323. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.3 | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Felicia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Skoda Felicia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Felicia is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |