Skoda Felicia 1998 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Getz is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Felicia engine produces 24 HP less power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 91 NM less than Hyundai Getz. Due to the lower power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Getz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Felicia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Getz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato, Hyundai Matrix | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Felicia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.49 m | |
| Skoda Felicia is 4 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 977 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.5 metres more than that of the Hyundai Getz, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 750 | 1`575 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Hyundai Getz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 465 percent more cases than Hyundai Getz, so Hyundai Getz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |