Skoda Felicia 1998 vs Skoda Fabia 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Felicia) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Fabia) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Felicia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Felicia engine produces 11 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Felicia consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is smaller. Skoda Felicia is 10 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1015 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 205 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |