Skoda Felicia 1998 vs Peugeot 206 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Felicia engine produces 15 HP less power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Peugeot 206. Due to the lower power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Felicia consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Felicia is 4 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1070 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.6 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Peugeot 206 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than Peugeot 206, so Peugeot 206 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |