Skoda Felicia 1998 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Felicia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Felicia and Mitsubishi Colt have the same engine power, but Skoda Felicia torque is 27 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is smaller, but higher. Skoda Felicia is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Skoda Felicia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |