Skoda Felicia 1998 vs Fiat Punto 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Fiat Punto is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Felicia engine produces 5 HP less power than Fiat Punto, but torque is 21 NM more than Fiat Punto. Due to the lower power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Punto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Punto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Felicia consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Punto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Punto gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Felicia engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Brava, Fiat Stilo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
| Skoda Felicia is 2 cm longer than the Fiat Punto, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 297 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1080 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Fiat Punto has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Felicia, so Fiat Punto quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Fiat Punto has
| |