Skoda Felicia 1998 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skoda Felicia is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volvo V40 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 75 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 99 - 135 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 16.5 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 6.9 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Skoda Felicia petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Skoda Felicia equipped with diesel engines consume 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is smaller. Skoda Felicia is 50 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 838 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |