Skoda Felicia 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skoda Felicia is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Polo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.0 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 75 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 99 - 135 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 16.5 seconds | 8.7 - 18.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 6.9 | 4.4 - 7.5 | |
|
On average, the Skoda Felicia petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volkswagen Polo. On average, Skoda Felicia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is larger. Skoda Felicia is 13 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 975 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 838 | ~ 1`416 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |