Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 LPG | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 900 NM | 180 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 7 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, but torque is 720 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 3.8 | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Citigo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Citigo could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 12 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 260 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
300 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.56 m | 4.00 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
Skoda Citigo is 44 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Citigo is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 213 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`370 | 1`644 | |
Safety: | |||
Skoda Fabia scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Fabia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 8400 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |