Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Toyota Aygo 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 69 HP | |
Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
Skoda Citigo is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Citigo engine produces 6 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Toyota Aygo 2014 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.56 m | 3.46 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.62 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
Skoda Citigo is larger. Skoda Citigo is 11 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 168 litres | |
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Skoda Citigo has 83 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 8400 | 8000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |