Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Opel Karl 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 96 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Citigo and Opel Karl have the same engine power, but Skoda Citigo torque is 1 NM less than Opel Karl. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Karl, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Karl. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 32 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Skoda Citigo is 11 cm shorter than the Opel Karl, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1013 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Citigo has 45 litres more trunk space than the Opel Karl. The Opel Karl may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`353 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Citigo scores higher in safety tests, but Opel Karl is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Citigo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Opel Karl has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Opel Karl, so Opel Karl quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Opel Karl has
| |