Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Kia Picanto 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 67 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 96 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Kia Picanto is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 8 HP more power than Kia Picanto, but torque is 1 NM less than Kia Picanto. Despite the higher power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Skoda Citigo is 3 cm shorter than the Kia Picanto, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1010 litres | |
| Skoda Citigo has 4 litres less trunk space than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Citigo scores higher in safety tests, but Kia Picanto is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Citigo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Kia Picanto has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia Picanto, so Kia Picanto quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |