Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Suzuki Swift 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 15 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 37 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 121 mm (4.8 inches) | 115 mm (4.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is smaller. Skoda Citigo is 28 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
959 litres | 947 litres | |
| Skoda Citigo has 14 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Citigo (by 12 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`290 kg | 1`365 kg | |
| Net weight: | 865 kg | 840 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 425 kg | 525 kg | |
| Skoda Citigo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than Suzuki Swift. Therefore, Suzuki Swift is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Citigo is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Citigo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Citigo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Skoda Citigo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |