Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Citigo and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Citigo is 43 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 330 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Skoda Citigo has 79 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`541 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Fabia scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Fabia scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |