Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Volkswagen Up! 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Up! is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Up!, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Volkswagen Up!. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 121 mm (4.8 inches) | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Up! can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Up! version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Citigo is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Up!, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Citigo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
959 litres | 959 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`290 kg | 1`360 kg | |
| Net weight: | 865 kg | 1`002 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 425 kg | 358 kg | |
| Skoda Citigo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Volkswagen Up!. Therefore, Skoda Citigo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Up! has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Up!, so Volkswagen Up! quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Volkswagen Up! has
| |