Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Mini Cooper S 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper S is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 117 HP less power than Mini Cooper S, whereas torque is 185 NM less than Mini Cooper S. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper S, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper S. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 121 mm (4.8 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mini Cooper S can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mini Cooper S version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is smaller, but higher. Skoda Citigo is 29 cm shorter than the Mini Cooper S, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
959 litres | 731 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mini Cooper S may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Citigo (by 228 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 1 metres less than that of the Mini Cooper S, which means Skoda Citigo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`290 kg | 1`635 kg | |
| Net weight: | 865 kg | 1`220 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 425 kg | 415 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Mini Cooper S has
| |