Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Kia Picanto 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 122 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Skoda Citigo engine produces 9 HP less power than Kia Picanto, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Kia Picanto. Despite less power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 121 mm (4.8 inches) | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Kia Picanto can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Kia Picanto version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Kia Picanto 2017 1.2 engine: Most owners speak positively about this engine. It has a simple and reliable design with no major engineering flaws. The main downsides are noticeable noise, vibrations, and modest power output. With proper ... More about Kia Picanto 2017 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Skoda Citigo is 3 cm shorter than the Kia Picanto, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
959 litres | 1010 litres | |
| Skoda Citigo has 4 litres less trunk space than the Kia Picanto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Picanto (by 51 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Picanto, which means Skoda Citigo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Citigo scores higher in safety tests, but Kia Picanto is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Citigo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Kia Picanto has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia Picanto, so Kia Picanto quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |