Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Suzuki Swift 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 42 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 5.0 | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Citigo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 37 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | 115 mm (4.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Citigo can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Citigo version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is smaller. Skoda Citigo is 28 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
959 litres | 947 litres | |
| Skoda Citigo has 14 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Citigo (by 12 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`300 kg | 1`380 kg | |
| Net weight: | 857 kg | 940 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 443 kg | 440 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Citigo is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Citigo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Citigo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Skoda Citigo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |