Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 50 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Citigo is 43 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 330 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Skoda Citigo has 79 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`620 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Fabia scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Fabia scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |