Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Toyota Aygo 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 69 HP | |
Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
Toyota Aygo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 9 HP less power than Toyota Aygo, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Citigo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
940 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
530 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Toyota Aygo 2014 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.56 m | 3.46 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.62 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
Skoda Citigo is larger. Skoda Citigo is 11 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 168 litres | |
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Skoda Citigo has 83 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 8400 | 8000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |