Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.7 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 11 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, but torque is 7 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Citigo consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is smaller. Skoda Citigo is 23 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 912 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Citigo has 16 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The Mitsubishi Space Star may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Skoda Citigo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |