Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Suzuki Alto 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Alto is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 8 HP less power than Suzuki Alto, but torque is 5 NM more than Suzuki Alto. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is larger. Skoda Citigo is 6 cm longer than the Suzuki Alto, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 129 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 774 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Skoda Citigo has 122 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Alto. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto, which means Skoda Citigo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`250 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Citigo scores higher in safety tests, but Suzuki Alto is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Citigo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |