Skoda Citigo 2017 vs Mini Cooper 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 76 HP less power than Mini Cooper, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Mini Cooper. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 121 mm (4.8 inches) | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is smaller, but higher. Skoda Citigo is 26 cm shorter than the Mini Cooper, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
959 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mini Cooper may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 1 metres less than that of the Mini Cooper, which means Skoda Citigo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`290 kg | 1`595 kg | |
| Net weight: | 865 kg | 1`115 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 425 kg | 480 kg | |
| Skoda Citigo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Mini Cooper. Therefore, Mini Cooper is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Citigo is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mini Cooper has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Citigo, so Mini Cooper quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Mini Cooper has
| |