Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Volkswagen Up! 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Up! is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Up!, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Volkswagen Up!. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
| By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
| Skoda Citigo is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Up!, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Citigo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 251 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`360 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Up! has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Up!, so Volkswagen Up! quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Volkswagen Up! has
| |