Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Volkswagen Up! 2016

 
Skoda Citigo
2012 - 2017
Volkswagen Up!
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP90 HP
Torque: 95 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds9.9 seconds
Volkswagen Up! is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Citigo engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Up!, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Volkswagen Up!. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.24.4
Real fuel consumption: 5.4 l/100km5.4 l/100km
By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway920 km on highway
640 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.56 m3.60 m
Width: 1.65 m1.64 m
Height: 1.46 m1.50 m
Skoda Citigo is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Up!, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Citigo is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 251 litres251 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
959 litres959 litres
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.8 meters
Gross weight: 1`290 kg1`360 kg
Net weight:929 kg1`002 kg
Load capacity:361 kg358 kg
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Volkswagen Up! has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Up!, so Volkswagen Up! quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 48007800
Pros and Cons: Skoda Citigo has
  • lower price
Volkswagen Up! has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv