Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Volkswagen Up! 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Citigo is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Citigo engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Up!, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
| By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Citigo could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
| Skoda Citigo is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Up!, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Citigo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 251 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`330 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Up! has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Up!, so Volkswagen Up! quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Volkswagen Up! has
| |