Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Volkswagen Up! 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Skoda Citigo and Volkswagen Up! have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Citigo is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Up!, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Citigo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 251 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volkswagen Up! has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Up!, so Volkswagen Up! quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Volkswagen Up! has
| |