Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Nissan Micra 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 23 HP less power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Nissan Micra. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Citigo could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Citigo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is smaller. Skoda Citigo is 22 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 265 litres | |
| Skoda Citigo has 14 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Skoda Citigo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |