Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016

 
Skoda Citigo
2012 - 2017
Mitsubishi Space Star
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP71 HP
Torque: 95 NM88 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds13.6 seconds
Skoda Citigo is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Citigo engine produces 4 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Thanks to more power Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.24.2
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway970 km on highway
640 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.56 m3.80 m
Width: 1.65 m1.67 m
Height: 1.46 m1.51 m
Skoda Citigo is smaller.
Skoda Citigo is 23 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 251 litres235 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data912 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Citigo has 16 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The Mitsubishi Space Star may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.2 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Skoda Citigo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2901`290
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 48006200
Pros and Cons: Skoda Citigo has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv