Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Kia Picanto 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
| Skoda Citigo engine produces 10 HP less power than Kia Picanto, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Kia Picanto. Despite less power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 440 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Kia Picanto 2011 1.2 engine: Most owners speak positively about this engine. It has a simple and reliable design with no major engineering flaws. The main downsides are noticeable noise, vibrations, and modest power output. With proper ... More about Kia Picanto 2011 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Skoda Citigo is 3 cm shorter than the Kia Picanto, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
959 litres | 605 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Kia Picanto may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Citigo (by 354 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`290 kg | 1`370 kg | |
| Net weight: | 929 kg | 875 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 361 kg | 495 kg | |
| Skoda Citigo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 37 procentiem less than Kia Picanto. Therefore, Kia Picanto is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Citigo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Picanto, so Skoda Citigo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |