Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Kia Picanto 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Citigo is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Citigo engine produces 6 HP more power than Kia Picanto, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Skoda Citigo is 3 cm shorter than the Kia Picanto, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 605 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Citigo has 51 litres more trunk space than the Kia Picanto. The Kia Picanto may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Citigo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Picanto, so Skoda Citigo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
| |