Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Hyundai i10 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 99 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Citigo is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Citigo engine produces 6 HP more power than Hyundai i10, but torque is 4 NM less than Hyundai i10. Thanks to more power Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
| Skoda Citigo is 2 cm shorter than the Hyundai i10, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 225 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
959 litres | 910 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Hyundai i10 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Citigo (by 49 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai i10. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`290 kg | 1`405 kg | |
| Net weight: | 929 kg | 905 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 361 kg | 500 kg | |
| Skoda Citigo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 39 procentiem less than Hyundai i10. Therefore, Hyundai i10 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i10 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Hyundai i10 has
| |