Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Fiat 500 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Fiat 500 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 10 HP less power than Fiat 500, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Fiat 500. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat 500, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Citigo could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Citigo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat 500. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Citigo is 2 cm longer than the Fiat 500, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 185 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 550 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Skoda Citigo has 66 litres more trunk space than the Fiat 500. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Fiat 500, which means Skoda Citigo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`370 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat 500 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Fiat 500 has
| |