Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Fiat 500 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 102 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Fiat 500 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 6 HP more power than Fiat 500, but torque is 7 NM less than Fiat 500. Despite the higher power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat 500, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat 500. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Citigo is 2 cm longer than the Fiat 500, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 185 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Skoda Citigo has 66 litres more trunk space than the Fiat 500. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Fiat 500, which means Skoda Citigo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`305 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat 500 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Fiat 500 has
| |