Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Chevrolet Spark 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Citigo is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Citigo engine produces 7 HP more power than Chevrolet Spark, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Chevrolet Spark. Thanks to more power Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
| Skoda Citigo is 8 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Spark, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
959 litres | 873 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Chevrolet Spark may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Citigo (by 86 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Spark. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`290 kg | 1`355 kg | |
| Net weight: | 929 kg | 1`044 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 361 kg | 311 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Spark has serious deffects in 175 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Chevrolet Spark has
| |