Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Chevrolet Spark 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 81 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 111 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Spark is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 6 HP less power than Chevrolet Spark, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Chevrolet Spark. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
| Skoda Citigo is 8 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Spark, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
959 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Chevrolet Spark may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Spark. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`290 kg | 1`360 kg | |
| Net weight: | 929 kg | 939 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 361 kg | 421 kg | |
| Skoda Citigo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Chevrolet Spark. Therefore, Chevrolet Spark is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Spark has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Chevrolet Spark has
| |