Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Toyota Aygo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 8 HP less power than Toyota Aygo, but torque is 2 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2012 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is larger, but slightly lower. Skoda Citigo is 15 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 782 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage capacity. Skoda Citigo has 112 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Citigo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |