Skoda Citigo 2012 vs Mazda 2 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Citigo engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Mazda 2. Due to the lower power, Skoda Citigo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Citigo consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Skoda Citigo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Citigo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 2 2007 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.56 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Skoda Citigo is smaller. Skoda Citigo is 34 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Citigo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 787 litres | |
| Skoda Citigo has 1 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 2 has serious deffects in 290 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Citigo has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |